Works Cited

Works Consulted and Cited

• Altman, Rick. “A Semantic/Syntactic Approach to Film Genre.” Cinema Journal vol. 23, no. 3, Spring 1984, pp. 6–18.
• Friedman, Lyle et al. “Hollywood’s Gender Divide and its Effect on Films: Examining the Gender of Writers, Producers, and Directors Who Make Films that Failed the Bechdel Test.” The Pudding, pudding.cool/2017/03/bechdel. Accessed March 27 2018.
• Gibson, Marion. “‘We Will Not Fly Silently into the Night’” and “Witches in the Family: Comedy, Drama, and the Acceptance of American Witches.” Witchcraft: Myths in American Culture. Routledge, 2007, pp. 170-223.
• Grindon, Leger. “Cycles and Clusters: The Shape of Film Genre History.” Film Genre Reader IV, edited by Keith Barry Grant, U Texas P, 2012, pp. 42–59.
• Heftberger, Adelheid. “Do Computers Dream of Cinema? Film Data for Computer Analysis and Visualization.” Understanding Digital Humanities, edited by David M. Berry, Palgrave Macmillan, 2012, pp. 210-223.
• Hutton, Ronald. “The Global Contexts.” The Witch: A History of Fear from Ancient Times to the Present. Yale UP, 2017, pp. 3-43.
• Hoyt, Eric, et al. “Visualizing and Analyzing the Hollywood Screenplay with ScripThreads,” DHQ: Digital Humanities Quarterly, vol. 8, no. 4, 2014, www.digitalhumanities.org/dhq/vol/8/4/000190/000190.html.
• “ImagePlot.” Software Studies Initiative, Calit2 and The Graduate Center, CUNY, lab.softwarestudies.com/p/imageplot.html#features1. Accessed 28 Mar. 2018.
• Klein, Amanda Ann. American Film Cycles: Reframing Genres, Screening Social Problems, & Defining Subcultures. U Texas P, 2011.
• “SameDiff.” DataBasic, MIT Center for Civic Media and Engagement Lab, databasic.io/en/samediff. Accessed 28 Mar. 2018.
• Schatz, Thomas. “The Structural Influence: New Directions in Film Genre Study.” Quarterly Review of Film Studies, vol. 2, no. 3, August 1977, pp. 302–312.
• Short, Sue. Misfit Sisters: Screen Horror as Female Rites of Passage. Palgrave Macmillan, 2006.
• Ward, Sarah. “All of Them Witch: Individuality, Conformity, and the Occult on Screen.” Screen Education, no. 83, pp. 34-41.